So, it look like Paige Beckers is uh finally getting a little reality check once again from the media because uh yeah, ESPN just told it like it was. The best point guard under 25 is our girl Caitlyn Clark. Let’s dive. So, ESPN today ranked the top 10 players under 25 based on ceiling. This isn’t based on how good they are right now.
Well, ESPN just sent the haters into meltdown mode. Caitlyn Clark has officially been named the best WNBA player under 25. Not most popular, not just a big name, the best. And the tears on social media could fill a swimming pool. So ESPN just dropped a list of their 25 best WNBA players under the age of 25. And off a quick scan, it looks like they might have.
Some fans are furious. Some players’ stands are raging. But numbers don’t lie. and Clark is sitting on top. Do you agree Caitlyn Clark deserves the number one spot or would you give it to someone else under 25? Let’s just start with the headline. Caitlyn Clark, second year in the league, already ranked the best WNBA player under 25. Let that sink in.
You’ve got players like Paige Buers, Aaliyah Boston, Angel Ree, Cameron Brink, and plenty of other names who’ve been hyped non-stop. And yet, when ESPN puts the list together, Clark is at number one. That’s not hype. That’s production, impact, and star power rolled into one. We got it right. They got it right, y’all. It’s about time.
Coming in at number one, Numero Uno, the head honcho, the GOAT, Caitlyn Clark. Of course, the haters are furious. They’re claiming she hasn’t played enough games or the league is overrating her or this is just marketing. Funny how none of those excuses explain why she’s leading the league in attention, ticket sales, and television ratings while also averaging strong numbers on the floor.
You can’t just blame ESPN for wanting eyeballs. The reality is Clark brings results. Clark. Due to injuries, Caitlyn Clark has been limited to 13 games this season, averaging 17 points, nine assists, five rebounds. But when healthy, Clark’s impact is enormous. She stretches the floor with her shooting range, pushes the pace, picks apart defense with her passing.
The 23-year-old brings an unmatched excitement factory every time she’s on the court. And her confidence spreads to the whole team. She’s the biggest draw on the road of any WNBA player. So effect her effect on the entire league is huge. She is the league. She’s not a needle mover. She is the needle. Okay, look at her averages even through injury.
16 points, eight assists, and five rebounds per game in limited time. That’s not just solid, that’s elite creation. Eight assists in a league where some guards barely crack three. That’s a floor general. add her shooting range that stretches defenses out to the parking lot and you’ve got a player who changes the geometry of the game.
When Clark steps on the floor, defenses panic. And that’s not a stat, it’s an effect. Now, compare her to Paige Buckers, who came in at number two. Paige is talented, no question. She’s had a 40point game. She’s efficient, and she carries herself like a star. But she’s also missed time. Her numbers aren’t as explosive as Clark’s. And most importantly, her impact doesn’t ripple across the entire league the same way. Paige has fans.
Clark changes markets. There’s a difference. Caitlyn Clark’s pick and roll mate coming in at number three to 6’5 center. Aaliyah Boston, I would take her over Angel Reese. I just think she’s more talented and more skilled. Angel Reese does have a higher motor, but we talk about the size, the skill, the ability to pass the ball, pass out of double teams, play out of the short pick and roll, shoot the three, shoot the mid-range, score with the left hand, right hand around the basket.
I mean, Aaliyah Boston’s a monster. Then you’ve got Aaliyah Boston at number three. Boston is phenomenal when she’s aggressive, and Fever fans know she anchors the paint, but again, her presence doesn’t tilt defenses the way Clark’s does. Boston is elite in her lane, but her dominance depends on guards getting her the ball.
Clark creates her own plays and creates for everyone else. That’s why ESPN put her on top. On the cake, she’s the whole cake. Caitlyn Clark coming in at number one as the GOAT should. We are talking about 60 some odd records broken as a rookie. First team all WNBA. Um, top four in MVP voting. probably would have won MVP this year if she wouldn’t have got hurt, but we’ll win it next year.
Don’t worry about it. Caitlyn Clark number one welldeserved. I don’t believe it’s close. I don’t believe there’s anywhere. It should be Caitlyn Clark like one through five and then we get to the next player. That’s how I feel about it. And here’s the hilarious part. ESPN even admitted in their writeup that her effect on the WNBA as a whole is unmatched.
They flat out said she’s the biggest road draw of any player ever. That’s not me hyping it. That’s the league acknowledging reality. Wherever she goes, attendance spikes. Opposing teams schedule promos around her games. That’s not normal for a secondyear pro. That’s generational impact. But the salt levels are high. Scroll social media and you’ll see page stands crying about bias.
Angel Reese fans pointing to double doubles and random accounts saying Boston deserves it because she’s more polished. Meanwhile, ESPN’s article is clear. Clark stretches defenses with her shooting, dictates tempo, and delivers highlight passes that energize her team. That’s the best under 25 in plain language.
Now, let’s address the Paige Bucher situation more. Expectations killed her case. Coming into the league, GMs told ESPN she’d be a Hall of Famer from day one. That’s pressure. Then Clark shows up the year before, breaks records, leads Indiana to the playoffs, and makes national headlines every night. Suddenly, Paige’s solid rookie numbers don’t look groundbreaking.
They look ordinary compared to Clark’s explosion. That’s not Paige’s fault, but that’s the reality of timing. And the ESPN writeup even acknowledged it. Paige is great, but Clark’s rookie year reset the bar so high that it made Paige’s own start look smaller. That’s wild. Usually, the narrative is flipped. Rookies are measured against vets.
Instead, rookies now get measured against Caitlyn Clark. That’s what dominance looks like. As for Angel Ree at number five, that’s about right. She’s been productive. She’s gritty. She rebounds like a machine and she’s carved out her lane, but she’s not changing defenses the way Clark does. No team is building a game plan around stopping Ree from 30 ft.
With Clark, that’s mandatory. Ree is valuable. Clark is unguardable. Cameron Brink’s low ranking is all about injury. Healthy, she’d probably be top five. But the league doesn’t hand out whatif points. You’ve got to show it on the floor. Same with players like Camila Cardoso. Flashes of talent, but not consistent enough to demand a higher spot.
Clark, on the other hand, was consistent from day one. And that’s what drives people crazy. She didn’t need years to develop. She walked into the league and immediately shifted its economy. Ratings went up. Ticket sales broke records. ESPN moved games to prime time. And now, one year later, they’re ranking her above every under25 star in the game.
That’s not favoritism, that’s math. Boston’s fans might have the best gripe. They’ll say, “Without her, Indiana doesn’t function.” True, Boston is essential. But here’s the catch. Boston needs Clark as much as Clark needs Boston. Together, they form the Fever’s Foundation. Separate them, and Clark’s skill set is more unique. You can find good bigs.
You can’t find another guard with Clark’s shooting range and passing vision. That’s why she edges Boston. And let’s not forget, Clark is still only in her second year. She’s not peaking yet. This is just the start. If she’s already number one now, where is she in 3 years? In five? That’s the scary part for everyone else on the list.
They’re hoping she plateaus. The problem is all evidence says she’s still climbing. The funniest part of this whole ESPN ranking isn’t even Clark being first. It’s the meltdown that followed. You’d think naming Caitlyn Clark the best WNBA player under 25 was some sort of crime against humanity. the way fans of Paige Bukers, Aaliyah Boston, and Angel Reese were reacting online.
You’d swear ESPN just rigged the lottery. But here’s the thing, Clark didn’t earn this ranking because of hype alone. She earned it because her numbers and her impact are undeniable. Let’s take it apart piece by piece. Start with her scoring ability. Caitlyn Clark doesn’t just shoot threes. She shoots threes from ranges that break defensive schemes.
Other guards take a step behind the ark and call it deep. Clark pulls up from the logo like it’s a free throw that forces defenses to extend way past their comfort zone. Suddenly, driving lanes open, passing windows appear, and her teammates benefit. That’s not just good shooting. That’s a player forcing the entire league to change the way it defends.
Now, let’s talk passing vision. ESPN pointed out her eight assists per game. That number is nuts for a secondear pro, especially when you consider how much attention she gets. Defenders swarm her every possession, yet she still finds a way to zip passes across the floor, hit rollers in stride, or drop dimes to corner shooters.
Plenty of players can score. Very few can both score and create at a high level. Clark does both, which is why she’s number one. Rebounding, she’s a guard averaging five boards. That doesn’t sound crazy until you realize how often she’s tracking long rebounds and starting fast breaks on her own. That’s three phases of the game.
Scoring, passing, rebounding, where she’s already producing at a high level. Then add her intangible. She’s the most confident player on the court every night. That swagger isn’t fake. It spreads. Teammates play harder. Crowds get louder. Opponents get rattled. That’s value you can’t measure on a stat sheet.
Meanwhile, Paige Buer’s fans are pointing to her efficiency. Yes, Paige has the mid-range game locked down. Yes, she’s fundamentally smooth, but efficiency in the mid-range doesn’t shift the sport. It’s valuable, but it doesn’t revolutionize. Clark’s game is built to break systems, not just slide through them. That’s why the ranking isn’t close.
Paige is excellent, but Clark is transformational. Boston fans also have their argument. And honestly, they have a point. Boston is a monster when aggressive. She’s already an all-star and could be MVP level down the line. But here’s the difference. Boston’s dominance depends on her guards. She needs touches in the paint. She needs someone to set her up.
Clark is the setup. She doesn’t need anyone to spoon feed her points. That’s a level above. If you swapped Boston onto another team with weak guard play, her numbers dip. If you swap Clark anywhere, her numbers hold because she controls the ball. Angel Ree fans, of course, are riding her double double averages.
Rebounding machine, energy player, relentless motor. All true, but if you ask a coach which player they’d rather game plan against, the answer is obvious. You can game plan for a rebounder. You can’t game plan for someone who can pull up from 30 feet and drop 12 assists in the same game. Reese is tough. Clark is uncontainable. And let’s not skip over Dominique Malonga, who ESPN praised as a teenager setting production records.
She’s got a crazy future, but future potential isn’t present dominance. Clark is doing it right now. That’s why she’s first. You don’t get ranked on what might happen in 5 years. You get ranked on today. Today, Caitlyn Clark is the top under25 star in the WNBA. What really makes the haters fume is the off-c court impact.
ESPN highlighted it directly. Clark is the biggest road draw of any WNBA player ever. That’s not just under 25. That’s in league history. Teams sell out arenas just because she’s in town. Ticket resellers markup prices triple whenever she’s on the schedule. Merchandise spikes. TV ratings jump. You can’t argue with those receipts.
They matter just as much as stats when talking about best. Some fans complain that’s not basketball, that’s marketing. Wrong. That is basketball. Professional sports are about both production and draw. The league needs stars who can win and stars who can sell. Clark is both. She’s a walking highlight reel and a business model.
That combination is why ESPN named her number one. Now, let’s look at the rest of the rankings. Boston at three feels a little low. Honestly, she’s arguably been more impactful than Paige Buers, especially given how central she is to Indiana’s interior defense, but the writers clearly wanted to elevate Paige’s scoring efficiency. Fine.
Boston still has plenty of time to move up. The reality is Clark and Boston are a package deal in Indiana. One runs the floor, the other controls the paint. Without both, the Fever aren’t sniffing the playoffs. Players like Sonia Citroen, Cameron Brink, and Camila Cardardoso being lower on the list makes sense for now.
They’ve shown flashes, but not the kind of takeover ability Clark has. That’s the difference. Clark isn’t a flash. She’s a nightly event. Even when she has a bad game, she still finishes with a near double double in two or three plays that go viral. That consistency is what separates her. And let’s not forget Clark is only 23.
She’s not even close to her prime. That’s why this ranking is so painful for her critics. If she’s already the best under 25, what happens when she hits 27 or 29? She could be the face of the league for a decade. ESPN naming her number one is just confirming what we’ve already known since Iowa. She’s built different.
The funniest reactions online are from people saying, “This is too soon.” Too soon. She literally led her team to the playoffs as a rookie. She shattered records. She broke attendance marks. She got national broadcasts shifted to prime time. And she did all of this in year 1. Now in year two, she’s still producing even while dealing with injuries.
That’s not too soon. That’s right on time. Even the article admitted she brings an unmatched excitement factor every time she’s on the court. That’s the key. Players can be good without being exciting. They can be efficient without being mustwatch. Clark is both. She’s efficient enough to win and electric enough to matter.
That’s rare and that’s why she’s at the top. Meanwhile, the other names on the list are left battling for spots. Paige’s fans can cry. Boston’s fans can argue. Angels fans can shout. But the simple truth is Clark has outperformed expectations faster and harder than anyone else. That’s why she’s number one. The list isn’t about feelings.
It’s about facts. And the fact is Caitlyn Clark, second year in the WNBA, is already the best under 25. So ESPN made it official. Caitlyn Clark is the best WNBA player under 25. The haters are fuming. The stands are arguing. But the numbers and the impact don’t lie. Clark changes the game on and off the court, and this ranking proves it.
Do you agree with her at number one? Drop your thoughts, hit like and subscribe for