“Monica McNutt CALLS OUT All-Star Voting Bias”

Fiery ESPN Analyst Says Angel Reese Would Be the Top Vote-Getter “If She Were White”—Fans Erupt Over Shock Ranking at No. 13 Despite Big Stats and Big Wins

When it comes to speaking her mind, Monica McNutt never pulls punches. The outspoken ESPN analyst has once again set the basketball world on fire, this time calling out what she describes as clear bias in the WNBA All-Star voting process. Her target? The shockingly low ranking of Chicago Sky rookie sensation Angel Reese, who sits at No. 13 in votes despite her gaudy stats, relentless hustle, and the avalanche of headlines she’s generated in her first pro season.

“If Angel Reese was white, she would clearly have the most votes,” McNutt declared during a fiery on-air segment. “Look at the numbers, look at the wins, look at the attention she’s brought to the league. Thirteenth? That’s a joke.”

Her comments quickly went viral, sparking heated debates on race, media bias, and respect for women’s sports.

The Angel Reese Effect

Angel Reese, nicknamed the Bayou Barbie, stormed into the WNBA riding the momentum of her legendary college career at LSU. Known for her swagger, her rebounding dominance, and her unapologetic confidence, Reese has been one of the most talked-about rookies of the year.

She’s consistently put up double-doubles, helped the Sky secure big wins, and turned games into must-see TV. Off the court, her charisma has drawn headlines in fashion magazines and endorsements with global brands. By almost any metric—performance, popularity, or media attention—Reese should be at the top of the All-Star conversation.

And yet, the fan voting tells a different story: ranked 13th, far behind several veterans and rookies alike.

Monica McNutt Doesn’t Hold Back

McNutt’s frustration reflects a growing sentiment among fans and analysts who believe Reese is being undervalued—not because of her play, but because of who she is.

“This isn’t just about one player,” McNutt said. “This is about how we value young Black women who are unapologetically themselves. Angel has done everything you could possibly ask a rookie to do, and more. And still, she’s treated like she doesn’t belong at the top.”

Her words struck a chord, especially among Reese’s supporters, who see the 22-year-old as a face of the league’s future.

Fans React: Outrage and Support

Social media exploded within minutes of McNutt’s comments.

One fan tweeted: “Monica said what needed to be said. Angel Reese IS the moment, and the votes don’t reflect that.”

Another posted: “Thirteenth? That’s not just disrespect—it’s blatant bias.”

Some, however, pushed back, arguing that All-Star voting is about popularity and seniority, not just performance. “She’s a rookie. Pay your dues,” one critic wrote.

Still, the overwhelming sentiment online was one of support for Reese and outrage over her low ranking.

A Spotlight on Race and Representation

The debate has reignited conversations about how Black women athletes are perceived compared to their white counterparts. Reese, with her bold personality and unapologetic trash talk, has often been scrutinized more harshly than others who display similar traits.

McNutt’s claim—that Reese would be the clear top vote-getter if she were white—hit a nerve because it echoed what many fans have already been saying quietly. The WNBA has long fought for recognition and respect, but disparities in coverage and support remain.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Statistically, Reese’s case is airtight. She’s among the league leaders in rebounds per game, averages double-digit scoring, and has been instrumental in the Sky’s surprising wins.

Compared to players ranked above her, Reese’s production is not only competitive—it’s in many cases superior. Add to that her massive cultural impact, and her 13th-place ranking becomes harder to justify.

The League’s Response

So far, the WNBA has not issued an official comment on the controversy. The league typically promotes fan engagement as part of the All-Star voting process, but critics argue that relying so heavily on fan votes can lead to skewed results.

Some analysts suggest that the league may need to adjust the formula, giving more weight to coaches and player votes to ensure the best performers are properly recognized.

The Bigger Picture: Angel as a Movement

Whether or not Reese cracks the All-Star starting lineup, her impact is undeniable. She’s already sparked record attendance, boosted TV ratings, and inspired a new generation of fans.

Monica McNutt’s fiery defense of Reese only amplifies the growing consensus: Angel isn’t just another rookie—she’s a cultural force reshaping the WNBA.

Conclusion: A $2,000 Fine of Attention—For the League

Ironically, the controversy may only fuel Reese’s star power. By questioning her ranking, McNutt has placed a massive spotlight on the issue, forcing fans, media, and the league to confront uncomfortable truths about bias and representation.

For Angel Reese, being 13th in votes doesn’t diminish her impact. If anything, it proves her influence extends beyond the scoreboard. She’s become the center of a conversation much larger than basketball—one about fairness, race, and the future of women’s sports.

And as Monica McNutt boldly reminded the world: sometimes the rankings don’t tell the real story.